Development of Content MOOCs: Designing a Creativity Assessment for Elementary School Students in a Learning Management System (LMS) with a Self-Paced Instruction Model

Dwikoranto Dwikoranto, R T Lintangesukmanjaya, W A Surasmi, Suparti Suparti, D A Putra, I H Khansa, P A R Dewi

Abstract


Becoming a world-class open and distance learning university involves developing academic products by improving the quality of academic services and service reach for the entire community. Therefore, developing MOOC content in UT's Learning Management System (LMS) using the Self-Paced Instruction model is crucial. The lack of topics in UT's MOOCs needs to be addressed wisely. The issues to be addressed are the validity of the MOOC content on the topic of Designing an Assessment of Creativity for Elementary School Students linked to the UT LMS, and the competencies/learning outcomes and responses of students using the developed online course, This development research design uses the four-D model (4-D model), adapted from Thiagarajan et al., with the stages Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate. The research was conducted at the UT Surabaya UPBJJ (Education and Training Center) and Unesa (Unesa) as a collaborative research and development partner. Data were obtained from expert validation of MOOC content, learning outcomes, and responses from online course participants during limited trials in the Bojonegoro and Lamongan Learning Groups (Pokjar). The validation data from three education experts were described and the mean was determined. The online course participant test scores were reviewed and compared against the graduation criteria established by UT. The questionnaire response data was analyzed using percentages and described qualitatively. The development of the MOOC content for elementary school students' Creativity Assessment was found to be valid and reliable. Student learning outcomes improved. Students provided very positive responses, and the MOOCs can be accessed by all users of the UT LMS

Full Text:

PDF

References


M. Shahzad, M. T. Shafiq, D. Douglas, and M. Kassem, “Digital twins in built environments: an investigation of the characteristics, applications, and challenges,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 120, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020120

R. T. Lintangesukmanjaya, A. Mahendra, S. Anugrah, B. K. Prahani, D. Dwikoranto, M. Satriawan, and I. A. Rizki, “A EFA analysis of digital technology teaching materials in improving students' critical thinking in physics learning,” JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), pp. 23–38, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v14n1.p23-38

O. Anuyah, A. M. Conrado, C. Carlson, H. Gilbride, and R. Metoyer, “Exploring the barriers and potential opportunities of technology integration in community-based social service organizations,” ACM J. Comput. Sustain. Soc., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3610720

M. Al-Emran and C. Griffy-Brown, “The role of technology adoption in sustainable development: Overview, opportunities, challenges, and future research agendas,” Technology in Society, vol. 73, p. 102240, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102240

B. K. Prahani, J. Alfin, A. Fuad, H. Saphira, E. Hariyono, and N. Suprapto, “Learning management system (LMS) research during 1991–2021: How technology affects education,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. (iJET), vol. 17, no. 17, pp. 28–49, 2022

A. Al Mansoori, S. Ali, S. A. Pasha, M. Alghizzawi, M. Elareshi, A. D. Ziani, and H. Alsridi, “Technology enhanced learning through learning management system and virtual reality googles: a critical review,” in From Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: Mapping the Transitions, pp. 557–564, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28314-7_48.

H. Fibriasari, W. Andayani, T. T. A. Putri, and N. Harianja, “Learning management system now and in the future: Study case from the Indonesian university students,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. (IJIET), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 158–165, 2023.

C. Kurniawan, O. Fajarianto, I. N. Sari, T. C. Wulandari, and E. Marlina, “Assessing learning management system (LMS) for the dairy farmer: Obstacles to delivering online learning content,” JTP–J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 341–352, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v24i3.31453

D. Olugbade, O. A. Ojo, and A. E. Tolorunleke, “Challenges and limitations of Moodle LMS in handling large-scale projects: West-African universities lecturers’ perspective,” J. Educ. Technol. Instr., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 47–66, 2023.

Z. N. Khlaif, M. Ghanim, A. A. Obaid, S. Salha, and S. Affouneh, “The motives and challenges of developing and delivering MOOCs courses,” Educ. Knowl. Soc. (EKS), vol. 22, p. e23904, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23904

M. S. H. Munna, M. R. Hossain, and K. R. Saylo, “Digital education revolution: Evaluating LMS-based learning and traditional approaches,” J. Innov. Technol. Converg., vol. 6, no. 2, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.69478/JITC2024v6n002a03

H. Yu, “Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, p. 1181712, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712

M. F. I. Honga, M. J. Rampe, A. Lihiang, and E. Pongoh, “Developing learning module of environmental pollution materials based on the Borg and Gall model to students at Public Junior High School 3 Tondano,” unpublished.

R. B. Indaryanti, H. Harsono, S. Sutama, B. Murtiyasa, and B. Soemardjoko, “4D research and development model: Trends, challenges, and opportunities review,” J. Kajian Ilmiah, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.31599/na7deq07

N. I. Hl, N. Nasruddin, A. E. Sejati, and A. Sugiarto, “Developing teaching material of research methodology and learning with 4D model in facilitating learning during the COVID-19 pandemic to improve critical thinking skill,” J. Kependidikan, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 541–554, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i2.7110

R. T. Lintangesukmanjaya, A. Rizka, and A. B. Damarsha, “The Rasch model analysis: Case study in SDGs trend point 7 in physics learning based domicile,” J. Indones. Sustain. Dev. Plan., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 173–184, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.46456/jisdep.v6i2.608

T. T. N. Vu, “Understanding validity and reliability from qualitative and quantitative research traditions,” VNU J. Foreign Stud., vol. 37, no. 3, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4672

P. Coleman, “Validity and reliability within qualitative research for the caring sciences,” Int. J. Caring Sci., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 2041–2045, 2022.

A. M. Al-Rahmi, A. Shamsuddin, U. Alturki, A. Aldraiweesh, F. M. Yusof, W. M. Al-Rahmi, and A. A. Aljeraiwi, “The influence of information system success and technology acceptance model on social media factors in education,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 14, p. 7770, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147770

Y. N. Asrida, F. Amanda, and J. U. Fadilah, “Effectiveness and limitations on learning management systems (LMS) in learning and teaching: A systematic review,” ICOERESS, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 141–152, 2024.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29100/jipi.v10i3.9219

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Informatika)
ISSN 2540-8984
Published by
Prodi Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi
STKIP PGRI Tulungagung

Website :https://jurnal.stkippgritulungagung.ac.id/index.php/jipi/index
Email: jipi@stkippgritulungagung.ac.id

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.