Uji Usabilitas Media Interaktif Berbasis Augmented Reality untuk Pembelajaran Konsep Pemrograman

Sukirman Sukirman
Irma Yuliana
Irsyad Ihsanuddin
Bayu Setia Abi


DOI: https://doi.org/10.29100/jipi.v10i1.5717

Abstract


Pemrograman merupakan salah satu keahlian yang sangat dibutuhkan di era teknologi digital saat ini. Akan tetapi, media pembelajaran yang digunakan kebanyakan kurang interaktif dan inovatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan media interaktif berbasis augmented reality (AR) yang dirancang untuk memfasilitasi pembelajaran konsep pemrograman dan menguji usabilitasnya. Pengujian usabilitas dilakukan menggunakan System Usability Scale (SUS) untuk mengukur efektivitas, efisiensi, dan kepuasan pengguna. Media ini menekankan pembelajaran konsep algoritma melalui representasi visual flowchart yang interaktif. Partisipan yang terlibat dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 38 siswa SMK dengan usia 15-16 tahun. Mereka diminta untuk menggunakan media interaktif AR yang sudah dikembangkan untuk belajar konsep pemrograman dan kemudian mengisi kuesioner SUS. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa nilai rata-rata SUS adalah 71.32, yang berada di atas ambang batas 70, menunjukkan tingkat usabilitas yang baik. Dengan demikian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa media interaktif berbasis AR ini dapat digunakan (usable) untuk belajar konsep pemrograman.

Keywords


algoritma, augmented reality, flowchart, media interaktif berbasis augmented reality, pemrograman

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics :

References


Y. A. Uly and B. P. Jatmiko, “Berdasarkan Riset LinkedIn, Ini 10 Pekerjaan yang Paling Dicari Saat Pandemi,” Kompas.com, Jul. 04, 2020. Accessed: Jan. 10, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://money.kompas.com/read/2020/07/04/113000526/berdasarkan-riset-linkedin-ini-10-pekerjaan-yang-paling-dicari-saat-pandemi?

F. Heintz, L. Mannila, and T. Färnqvist, “A review of models for introducing computational thinking, computer science and computing in K-12 education,” in 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2016, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757410.

P. João, D. Nuno, S. F. Fábio, and P. Ana, “A Cross-analysis of Block-based and Visual Programming Apps with Computer Science Student-Teachers,” Educ. Sci., vol. 9, no. 3, 2019, doi: 10.3390/educsci9030181.

A. Saad, “Students’ Computational Thinking Skill through Cooperative Learning Based on Hands-on, Inquiry-based, and Student-centric Learning Approaches,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 290–296, 2020.

D. Kemdikbud, Kesiapan Sekolah Menengah Pertama dan Sekolah Menengah Atas dalam Menerapkan Informatika sebagai Mata Pelajaran pada Tahun 2019/2020. Indonesia, 2019.

Y. Hu, C.-H. Chen, and C.-Y. Su, “Exploring the Effectiveness and Moderators of Block-Based Visual Programming on Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis,” J. Educ. Comput. Res., vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1467–1493, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1177/0735633120945935.

C. Angeli and N. Valanides, “Developing young children’s computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy,” Comput. Human Behav., p. 105954, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018.

L. Zhang and J. Nouri, “A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9,” Comput. Educ., vol. 141, p. 103607, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607.

S. SUKIRMAN, L. F. M. IBHARIM, C. S. SAID, and B. MURTIYASA, “A Strategy of Learning Computational Thinking through Game Based in Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework,” Informatics Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 179–200, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.15388/infedu.2022.07.

D. Topalli and N. E. Cagiltay, “Improving programming skills in engineering education through problem-based game projects with Scratch,” Comput. Educ., vol. 120, pp. 64–74, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.011.

B. A. Becker, P. Denny, J. Finnie-Ansley, A. Luxton-Reilly, J. Prather, and E. A. Santos, “Programming Is Hard - Or at Least It Used to Be: Educational Opportunities and Challenges of AI Code Generation,” in Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, in SIGCSE 2023. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, pp. 500–506. doi: 10.1145/3545945.3569759.

Sukirman, D. A. Pramudita, A. Afiyanto, and Utaminingsih, “Block-Based Visual Programming as a Tool for Learning the Concepts of Programming for Novices,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 365–371, 2022, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.5.1628.

R. Azuma, Y. Baillot, R. Behringer, S. Feiner, S. Julier, and B. MacIntyre, “Recent advances in augmented reality,” IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 34–47, 2001, doi: 10.1109/38.963459.

M. Billinghurst and A. Duenser, “Augmented reality in the classroom,” Computer (Long. Beach. Calif)., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 56–63, 2012.

K.-Y. Chin and C.-S. Wang, “Effects of augmented reality technology in a mobile touring system on university students’ learning performance and interest,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 27–42, 2021, doi: 10.14742/ajet.5841.

A. Bangor, P. T. Kortum, and J. T. Miller, “An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale,” Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 574–594, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1080/10447310802205776.

J. Brooke, “SUS: A ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale,” Usability Eval. Ind., vol. 189, no. 194, pp. 4–7, 1996.

R. C. Richey and J. D. Klein, Design and Development Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007. doi: 10.4324/9780203826034.

R. C. Richey and J. D. Klein, “Design and Development Research BT - Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology,” J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, and M. J. Bishop, Eds., New York, NY: Springer New York, 2014, pp. 141–150. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_12.

R. C. Richey and J. D. Klein, “Research on design and development,” in Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merriënboer, and M. P. Driscoll, Eds., 3rd ed.Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2008, pp. 748–757.

J. R. Lewis, “The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future,” Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 577–590, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307.

P. Vlachogianni and N. Tselios, “Perceived usability evaluation of educational technology using the System Usability Scale (SUS): A systematic review,” J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 392–409, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2020.1867938.

D. Hariyanto, A. C. Nugraha, A. Asmara, and H. Liu, “An Asynchronous Serial Communication Learning Media: Usability Evaluation,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1413, p. 12018, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1413/1/012018.

A. Bangor, P. Kortum, and J. Miller, “Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale,” J. usability Stud., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 114–123, 2009.