EXPLORING HOW CHATGPT SUPPORTS ACADEMIC SELF-EFFICACY: A FOCUS GROUP STUDY OF PREMIUM STUDENT USERS IN DENMARK

Muhammad Siddiq Idris Azzam, Sri Yusriani, Endi Rekarti, Pitri Yanti, Prasetyo Harisandi

Abstract


The rapid growth of generative artificial intelligence has trans-formed how university students search for information, understand course materials, organize ideas, and complete academic tasks. Among these tools, ChatGPT has become increasingly prominent in higher education because it can provide instant explanations, inter-active feedback, writing assistance, and brainstorming support. However, the educational value of ChatGPT should not be viewed only in terms of efficiency. It is also important to examine whether sustained use of AI tools can strengthen students’ academic self-efficacy, namely their belief in their ability to understand academic content, complete assignments, and manage learning challenges. This study explores how ChatGPT supports academic self-efficacy among premium student users in Denmark. A qualitative descriptive design was employed using two focus group discussions involving 11 bachelor students, all of whom were premium ChatGPT users with experience using the platform for coursework, academic writ-ing, and simple academic projects. The findings show that ChatGPT was perceived as a supportive academic companion that helped stu-dents clarify difficult concepts, initiate assignments, reduce anxiety in the early stages of writing, and improve confidence in managing study tasks. At the same time, participants also expressed concerns about overreliance on AI, superficial understanding, and reduced critical engagement. The study concludes that ChatGPT can strengthen academic self-efficacy when it is used as a learning sup-port tool rather than a substitute for thinking. Its benefits depend on students’ digital maturity, learning intentions, and the presence of pedagogical guidance. Higher education institutions should there-fore integrate AI literacy, ethical reflection, and self-regulated learning strategies to ensure that generative AI supports students’ long-term academic development.

Keywords


ChatGPT; academic self-efficacy; higher education; focus group discussion;generative artificial intelligence; Denmark.

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change,” Psychological Review, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215, 1977, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.

A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY, USA: Freeman, 1997.

F. Pajares, “Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature,” Reading & Writing Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 139–158, 2003, doi: 10.1080/10573560308222.

B. J. Zimmerman, “Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 82–91, 2000, doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1016.

E. Kasneci, K. Sessler, S. Küchemann, M. Bannert, D. Dementieva, F. Fischer, U. Gasser, G. Groh, S. Günnemann, E. Hüllermeier, K. Krusche, A. Kutyniok, T. Michaeli, C. Nerdel, J. Pfeiffer, M. Poquet, M. Sailer, J. Schmidt, M. Seidel, and G. Kasneci, “ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 103, Art. no. 102274, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.

H. Crompton and D. Burke, “The educational affordances and challenges of ChatGPT: State of the field,” TechTrends, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 380–392, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11528-024-00939-0.

T. T. Le, “The impacts of students’ acceptance of ChatGPT on their academic self-efficacy in a personalized learning environment,” rEFLections, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1611–1637, 2025, doi: 10.61508/refl.v32i3.285294.

H. A. Shahat, M. E. Badawy, K. A. Elballah, and A. Ibrahim-Shook, “Self-efficacy as a mediator between ChatGPT usage and research motivation among post-graduate students,” International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 987–996, 2025, doi: 10.53894/ijirss.v8i4.7982.

C. K. Lo, “What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature,” Education Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, Art. no. 410, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13040410.

A. Tlili, R. Shehata, B. Adarkwah, H. Bozkurt, D. Hickey, R. Huang, and A. Agyemang, “What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 10, no. 1, Art. no. 15, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x.

C. K. Y. Chan and W. Hu, “Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 1, Art. no. 43, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8.

R. H. Mogavi, C. Deng, J. J. Kim, P. Zhou, Y. D. Kwon, A. H. S. Metwally, A. Tlili, S. Bassanelli, A. Bucchiarone, S. Gujar, L. E. Nacke, and P. Hui, “Exploring user perspectives on ChatGPT: Applications, perceptions, and implications for AI-integrated education,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13114, 2023, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2305.13114.

V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

R. A. Krueger and M. A. Casey, Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2015.

J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2018.

M. Gunarto, S. Yusriani, and S. P. S. Patiro, “Perceived organizational support as a moderator of job insecurity, turnover intention, and job satisfac-tion in private higher education,” Advances in Practical Research, vol. 5, Art. no. 20240250, 2024, doi: 10.46254/AP05.20240250.

P. Harisandi, R. Hurriyati, V. Gaffar, L. A. Wibowo, P. Yanti, S. Yusriani, and P. Purwanto, “Personal branding of lecturers and word of mouth: Effec-tive education strategy in increasing the attractiveness of entrepreneurship study program and reputation of Pelita Bangsa University,” International Journal of Recent Educational Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 758–774, 2025, doi: 10.46245/ijorer.v6i3.813.

S. Yusriani, H. Hanifah, E. Rekarti, S. P. S. Patiro, and M. Gunarto, “What drives entrepreneurial intention in the digital era? Insights from postgradu-ate students experiencing AI-based entrepreneurial education,” Kontigensi: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1124–1146, 2025, doi: 10.56457/jimk.v13i2.873.

M. Haikal, “Quality analysis of e-learning website at PT XYZ using modified WebQual method and importance performance analysis,” JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Informatika), vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1850–1858, 2025, doi: 10.29100/jipi.v10i3.6302.

L. M. Carlsen and B. E. Jessen, “University students learning to model through large amounts of data, simulations and ChatGPT,” in Proceedings of the Fourteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME14), Bozen-Bolzano, Italy, Feb. 2025.

T. Bruhn and F. Marquart, “Student experiences of ChatGPT as a feedback tool in higher education,” Læring og Medier (LOM), vol. 17, no. 31, 2025, doi: 10.7146/lom.v17i31.144043.

O. Driessens and M. Pischetola, “Danish university policies on generative AI: Problems, assumptions and sustainability blind spots,” MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, vol. 40, no. 76, pp. 31–52, 2024, doi: 10.7146/mk.v40i76.143595.

M. Faraon, K. Rönkkö, M. Milrad, and E. Tsui, “International perspectives on artificial intelligence in higher education: An explorative study of students’ intention to use ChatGPT across the Nordic countries and the USA,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 30, no. 13, pp. 17835–17880, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-025-13492-x.

M. H. Kaya, S. Topçu, E. K. Kaplan, and E. Ertürk, “Exploring the acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: Student and instructor perspectives,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 10, 2025, Art. no. 1652292, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1652292.

B. Meyer, U. H. Jensen, and S. P. Knudsen, “Patterns of adoption and learning: Students’ relationships with generative AIs,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on AI Research, R. P. Dameri, Ed. Academic Conferences & Publishing International, 2025, pp. 313–319, doi: 10.34190/icair.5.1.4273.

P. Haindl and G. Weinberger, “Students’ experiences of using ChatGPT in an undergraduate programming course,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 43519–43529, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3380909.

M. B. Garcia, “Teaching and learning computer programming using ChatGPT: A rapid review of literature amid the rise of generative AI technolo-gies,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 16721–16745, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-025-13452-5.

N. Baláž, J. Porubän, M. Horváth, and T. Kormaník, “Using ChatGPT during implementation of programs in education,” in 5th International Com-puter Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2024), OpenAccess Series in Informatics (OASIcs), vol. 122, 2024, Art. no. 18, pp. 18:1–18:9, doi: 10.4230/OASIcs.ICPEC.2024.18.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29100/jipi.v11i3.11119

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Informatika)
ISSN 2540-8984
Published by
Prodi Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi
Universitas Bhinneka PGRI

Website :https://jurnal.stkippgritulungagung.ac.id/index.php/jipi/index
Email: jipistkippti@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.