Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Rontal Keilmuan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan mengundang para ilmuwan untuk mempublikasikan karya ilmiah berupa penelitian atau makalah yang dibuat dalam bentuk artikel berkaitan dengan isu-isu politik, sosial, hukum, kebudayaan dan perekonomian warga negara berdasarkan pancasila. Kewarganegaraan diperlakukan sebagai konsep strategis dalam analisis Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa, Kemanusiaan Yang Adil dan Beradab, Persatuan Indonesia, Kerakyatan Yang Dipimpin Oleh Hikmat Kebijaksanaan dalam Permusyawaratan dan Perwakilan, Keadilan Sosial Bagi Seluruh Rakyat Indonesia


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Arkikel yang masuk (submited) ke Jurnal Rontal Keilmuan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan akan ditelaah oleh Editor untuk disesuaikan dengan ruang lingkup (focus & scoup) Jurnal dan dipindai dengan program anti plagiarism x checker untuk memastikan tidak ada unsur plagiarisme dengan ketentuan tidak melebihi 15 persen.

Setelah artikel susuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal dan unsur plagiarismenya tidak lebih dari 15 persen, Editor menugaskan reviewer sesuai dengan bidang ilmu yang dibahas dalam artikel secara Double Blind Peer ReviewDouble Blind Peer Review adalah metode penelaahan teman sejawat terhadap subuah karya ilmiah yang akan dipublikasikan dalam terbitan berkala ilmiah, yang mana identitas reviewer dan penulis disembunyikan, sehingga reviewer tidak mengetahui artikel siapa yang sedang ditelaah dan penulis juga tidak mengetahui siapa yang menelaah artikelnya. Metode ini digunakan untuk menjaga obyektivitas hasil penelaahan. 

Setiap artikel akan ditelaah oleh dua orang penelaah (reviewer), 1 penelaah internal dan 1 peneleaah eksternal. Jika kedua penelaah hasilnya bertentangan maka Editor akan menunjuk penelaah ketiga.


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. 



This Journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archieving system among participating libraries and permit those libraries to create permanent archieves of journal for purposes of preservation and restoration


Publication Ethics

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in Journal Rontal is a reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author and the journal editor.


Publication decisions
The editors of the Journal Rontal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.


Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.


Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.


Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions 
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity 
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources 
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest 
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.


Duties of Authors
Reporting standards 
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
Data Access and Retention 
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism 
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. in addition, to ensure every article submit in Journal Rontal free of plagiarism, the editors using viper plagiarism scanner. 
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication 
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources 
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper 
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects 
If the work involves chemicals, human, animals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest 
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works 
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.