SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: HUBUNGAN ANTARA PEMBELAJARAN REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (RME) TERHADAP DISPOSISI MATEMATIS
Abstract
Realistik Mathematics Education (RME) stems from the understanding that mathematics is a human activity, with the main goal being to facilitate the transition from informal to formal knowledge through problem-solving in a real-world context. The purpose of this study is to conduct literary analysis related to the relationship between RME and mathematical disposition. Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is the method used. Data collection is carried out by documenting and reviewing every article about the relationship between mathematical and RME dispositions that have this research as part of it. A total of sixteen articles from Google Schoolar, Scopus, and ERIC were used in this experiment. RME is a term used in mathematics that has been published from 2014 to 2024. The study's findings indicate a positive correlation between the RME paradigm and mathematical disposition. Pendekatan RME is also effective in enhancing students' abilities in a constructive way and fostering their self-confidence in the context of mathematical education. Later, mathematical aptitude continues to be the primary factor in enhancing a particular problem in RME.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFArticle Metrics :
References
Aprilianti, I., Lestariningsih, L., & Lutfianto, M. (2024). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Logaritma. Jurnal Edukasi: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.51836/je.v9i2.622
Chau Nguyen, G. T., & Hai Pham, C. T. (2023). An empirical study of factors influencing primary school teachers’ long-term commitment to Realistic Mathematics Education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.V14I1.PP1-18
Denız, Ö., & Uygur-Kabael, T. (2017). Eğim kavramının gerçekçi matematik eğitimi yaklaşımı altında matematikleştirilme süreci. Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi, 32(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2016018796
Desi Riskasusanti, M. Amin dan Fauzi, N. S. (2017). Development of Materials to Improve the Ability of Resolution and Disposition Mathematic Through Mathematical Approach Realistic in Class V Sd Negeri Lamsayeun Aceh Besar. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(24), 42-51–51.
Dina, Z. H., Ikhsan, M., & Hajidin, H. (2019). The Improvement of Communication and Mathematical Disposition Abilities through Discovery Learning Model in Junior High School. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 4(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v4i1.6824
Doç, Y., & Yağcı, E. (2010). Gerçekçi Matematik Öğretimi Yaklaşımı. 265–268.
Fitria, K. N., Mastur, Z., & Suyitno, A. (2022). Relationship of Mathematical Disposition with Student Problem Solving Construction Using Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Model. AlphaMath : Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(2), 175. https://doi.org/10.30595/alphamath.v8i2.13612
Gravemeijer, K. (2020). Emergent Modeling: an RME Design Heuristic Elaborated in a Series of Examples. Journal of the International Society for Design and Development in Education, 4(13), 1–31.
Haji, S., Yumiati, Y., & Zamzaili, Z. (2019). Improving Students’ Productive Disposition through Realistic Mathematics Education with Outdoor Approach. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 4(2), 101–111.
https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v4i2.8385
Juharti, N., & Kartika, L. (2021). Comparison of Student Learning Outcomes in Class VIII SMP Negeri 2 Muaro Jambi. Integrated Science Education Journal, 2(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v2i1.127
Kamid, K., Huda, N., Syafmen, W., Sufri, S., & Sofnidar, S. (2021). The relationship between students’ mathematical disposition and their learning outcomes. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(3), 376–382. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i3.17604
Rahayu, R., Kartono, & Sulhadi. (2014). The Effect of Mathematical Disposition on PMRIToward Problem Solving Ability Based on Ideal Problem Solver. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(10), 1315–1318.
Saragih, R. F. (2017). Differences Representation Ability and Mathematical Disposition Students Who Realistic Mathematics Learning and Contextual Teaching and Learning Approached ( CTL ) in SMP N 12 MEDAN. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(30), 92–100.
Sembiring, R ., Hoogland, K., & Dolk, M. (2010). A_decade_of_PMRI_in_Indonesia_red_Sembiring_Hoogland_Dolk.pdf.
Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001
Triandini, E., Jayanatha, S., Indrawan, A., Werla Putra, G., & Iswara, B. (2019). Metode Systematic Literature Review untuk Identifikasi Platform dan Metode Pengembangan Sistem Informasi di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 1(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v1i2.1916
Yuanita, P., Zulnaidi, H., & Zakaria, E. (2018). The effectiveness of Realistic Mathematics Education approach: The role of mathematical representation as mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving. PLoS ONE, 13(9), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204847