EFL STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES AND PRACTICES TOWARD AI-BASED WRITING ASSISTANTS: AN EXPLANATORY MIXED-METHODS STUDY

Titik Lina Widyaningsih, Ayu Rizki Septiana, Moh. Hanafi, Moh. Choirul Huda

Abstract


The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in education has gained significant momentum, particularly through AI-based writing assistants (AIbWAs), which offer considerable potential for enhancing the writing skills of EFL students. This explanatory mixed-methods study aimed to investigate EFL students' attitudes toward AIbWAs and explore their practices in academic writing classes. The participants were 83 EFL students from a private university in Indonesia. Quantitative data were collected through a closed-ended questionnaire using a 4-point Likert scale to measure cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions of students’ attitudes. The AIWAs examined included QuillBot, Grammarly, and ChatGPT. Based on attitude scores, students were categorized into four groups: embracing (31.3%), acceptance (38.6%), indifference (26.5%), and resistance (3.6%). The mean attitude score was 3.21, reflecting a generally favorable perception. Students in the embracing and acceptance groups reported frequent use of AIbWAs for grammar correction, paraphrasing, vocabulary enhancement, and idea development. Students in the indifference group used the tools sporadically, often citing uncertainty or lack of confidence in the AI output. The resistance group raised concerns about overreliance, academic dishonesty, and the potential loss of personal writing voice. Twelve students representing each group were selected for semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis of interview data revealed three key themes: perceived usefulness in improving writing quality, trust and skepticism toward AIbWAs' suggestions, and the perceived need for human judgment and ethical boundaries in academic writing. The findings underscore the importance of targeted digital literacy and pedagogical guidance to support effective and ethical use of AIbWAs in EFL contexts

Full Text:

PDF

References


Y. Shen, L., Wang, S., & Xin, “EFL students’ writing engagement and AI attitude in GenAI-assisted contexts: A mixed-methods study grounded in SDT and TAM,” Learn. Motiv., vol. 19, p. 102168, 2025.

Y. Du, C., Tang, M., Wang, C., Zou, B., Xia, Y., & Du, “Who is most likely to accept AI chatbots? A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study of personality and ChatGPT acceptance for language learning,” Innov. Lang. Learn. Teach., pp. 1–22, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2025.2555515.

Y. Guo, Y., & Wang, “Exploring the effects of artificial intelligence application on EFL students’ academic engagement and emotional experiences: A Mixed‐Methods study,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 60, no. 1, p. e12812, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12812.

J. Escalante, A. Pack, and A. Barrett, “AI-generated feedback on writing: insights into efficacy and ENL student preference,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2.

D. T. Y. G. Sumakul, F. A. Hamied, and D. Sukyadi, “Artificial Intelligence in EFL Classrooms: Friend or Foe?,” Learn J. Lang. Educ. Acquis. Res. Netw., vol. 15, no. 1, 2022.

E. Y. Kurniati and R. Fithriani, “Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Quillbot Utilization in English Academic Writing Class,” J. English Lang. Teach. Linguist., vol. 7, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852.

H. S. Rad, R. Alipour, and A. Jafarpour, “Using artificial intelligence to foster students’ writing feedback literacy, engagement, and outcome: a case of Wordtune application,” Interact. Learn. Environ., 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2023.2208170.

R. A. Nurisma, W. I. M. Rohmana, T. L. Widyaningsih, and B. Y. Cahyono, “Implementing Double-Entry Journal assisted with Instagram to foster engagement in EFL writing,” Stud. English Lang. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.24815/siele.v11i1.30425.

C. Coffin, M. J. Curry, S. Goodman, A. Hewings, T. M. Lillis, and J. Swan, Teaching Academic Writing A toolkit for higher education. 2003. doi: 10.1080/07294360701494286.

D. Rohayati and F. R. Kosasih, “E–writing activity using Instant Messaging to ignite EFL students’ critical thinking in writing English argumentation on a conservation issue,” Interdiscip. Int. J. Conserv. Cult., vol. 1, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.25157/iijcc.v1i1.2908.

Y. Han and F. Hyland, “Academic emotions in written corrective feedback situations,” J. English Acad. Purp., vol. 38, pp. 1–13, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.003.

S. Aldabbus and E. Almansouri, “Academic Writing Difficulties Encountered by University EFL Learners,” Br. J. English Lang. Linguist., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.37745/bjel.2013/vol10n3111.

S. Supiani, N. M. Rahmawati, Ratnawati, T. L. Widyaningsih, N. Suryati, and N. Mukminatien, “EFL Students’ Language Accuracy Development through Self-Assessment from Online Written Feedback: How Do They Experience and Perceive It?,” CALL-EJ, vol. 24, no. 2, 2023.

Z. N. Raheem, B. R., Anjum, F., & Ghafar, “Exploring the Profound Impact of Artificial Intelligence Applications (Quillbot, Grammarly and ChatGPT) on English Academic Writing: A Systematic Review,” Int. J. Integr. Res., vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 599–622, 2023.

A. M. Moneus and Y. Sahari, “Artificial intelligence and human translation: A contrastive study based on legal texts,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 6, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28106.

W. Xu, J. Meng, S. Kanaga Suba Raja, M. Padma Priya, and M. Kiruthiga Devi, “Artificial intelligence in constructing personalized and accurate feedback systems for students,” Int. J. Model. Simulation, Sci. Comput., vol. 14, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1142/S1793962323410015.

E. Szmyd, K., & Mitera, “The impact of artificial intelligence on the development of critical thinking skills in students,” Eur. Res. Stud. J., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1022-1039., 2024.

A. M. S. Moybeka, N. Syariatin, D. P. Tatipang, D. A. Mushthoza, N. P. J. L. Dewi, and S. Tineh, “Artificial Intelligence and English Classroom: The Implications of AI Toward EFL Students’ Motivation,” Edumaspul J. Pendidik., vol. 7, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.33487/edumaspul.v7i2.6669.

Q. Hu, Y. Lu, Z. Pan, Y. Gong, and Z. Yang, “Can AI artifacts influence human cognition? The effects of artificial autonomy in intelligent personal assistants,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 56, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102250.

F. Wijnen, J. Walma van der Molen, and J. Voogt, “Primary school teachers’ attitudes toward technology use and stimulating higher-order thinking in students: a review of the literature,” J. Res. Technol. Educ., 2021, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2021.1991864.

W. Ziqi, C., Xinhua, Z., Qi, L., & Wei, “L2 students’ barriers in engaging with form and content-focused AI-generated feedback in revising their compositions,” Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn., vol. 1, no. 21, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2422478.

K. J. Jeong, H., Han, S.-S., Jung, H.-I., Lee, W., & Jeon, “Perceptions and attitudes of dental students and dentists in South Korea toward artificial intelligence: A subgroup analysis based on professional seniority,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 24, no. 1, p. 430, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05441-y.

W. Liu, EXPLORING LEARNERS’BELIEFS ABOUT LANGUAGE LEARNING IN THE AI ERA. 2024.

Y. K. Mogaji, E., Viglia, G., Srivastava, P., & Dwivedi, “Is it the end of the technology acceptance model in the era of generative artificial intelligence?,” Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag., vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 3324–3339, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-08-2023-1271.

Z. Yu, “The study of the correlation between AI-assisted EFL writing frequency and writing anxiety among Chinese university students,” Acad. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 7–15, 2024, doi: DOI: 10.25236/AJHSS.2024.070702.

G. Liu and C. Ma, “Measuring EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model,” Innov. Lang. Learn. Teach., vol. 18, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316.

J. D. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches 5th Edition. Sage Publications, 2018.

N. Burchett, “Book Review: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches,” Br. J. Occup. Ther., vol. 77, no. 8, 2014, doi: 10.1177/030802261407700807.

T. M. Kin and O. A. Kareem, “Measuring teacher attitudes towards change: An empirical validation,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 11, no. 4, 2017, doi: 10.1504/IJMIE.2017.086909.

X. Pan, “Pan, X. (2020). Technology acceptance, technological self-efficacy, and attitude towards technology-based self-directed learning: learning motivation as a mediator,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, no. 564294, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294.

J. S. Barrot, “Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: effects on L2 writing accuracy,” Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn., 2021, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2021.1936071.

H. F. Li, “Effects of a ChatGPT-based flipped learning guiding approach on learners’ courseware project performances and perceptions,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 39, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.14742/ajet.8923.

J. W. Creswell, Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 2012. doi: 10.2307/1523157.

P. Ardi, T. L. Widyaningsih, and U. Widiati, “Appreciative collaborative reflection to catalyze Indonesian EFL teachers’ identity configuration in a teacher professional education program,” Educ. Self Dev., vol. 18, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.26907/esd.18.2.02.

A. G. Candela, “Exploring the function of member checking,” Qual. Rep., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 619–628, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3726.

D. Adams and K.-M. Chuah, “Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Research Writing. Current Trends and Future Potentials,” in Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education; A Practical Approach, vol. 1, 2023.

S. Khabib, “Introducing artificial intelligence (AI)-based digital writing assistants for teachers in writing scientific articles,” Teach. English as a Foreign Lang. J., vol. 1, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.12928/tefl.v1i2.249.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29100/jipi.v9i4.9184

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Informatika)
ISSN 2540-8984
Published by
Prodi Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi
Universitas Bhinneka PGRI

Website :https://jurnal.stkippgritulungagung.ac.id/index.php/jipi/index
Email: jipistkippti@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.