QUALITY ANALYSIS OF E-LEARNING WEBSITE AT PT XYZ USING MODIFIED WEBQUAL METHOD AND IMPORTANCE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

Muhammad Haikal


DOI: https://doi.org/10.29100/jipi.v10i3.6302

Abstract


The continuous development of information technology is one of its best features. The steady trend in the rapid advancement of information technology has created a necessity for institutions to adapt in order to remain competitive in this era. Considering the large number of website users in Indonesia, it is evident that the quality of websites as a medium for disseminating information is crucial. This research measures the quality of the e-learning website at PT XYZ using the Modified Webqual and Importance Performance Analysis methods. The Modified Webqual method is an extension of the Webqual 4.0 method, used to measure website quality based on four components: Usability Quality, Information Quality, Interaction Quality, and Privacy and Security. Meanwhile, Importance Performance Analysis is used to measure user satisfaction based on expectations of website quality. Data was collected through questionnaires and then subjected to validity and reliability tests, descriptive analysis, and gap analysis between user perceptions and expectations. Subsequently, the data was categorized using the Importance Performance Analysis method. The final results indicated that the e-learning website at PT XYZ has not yet met user expectations, as indicated by the gap analysis with a value < 0, meaning that user importance or expectations are still higher than the website's performance. This research is part of a collection of articles and papers on the evaluation of the quality of various online platforms, including e-learning websites, and the research methods used are evaluative and quantitative in nature

Keywords


Modified Webqual; Importance Performance Analysis; e-learning website

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics :

References


M. H. AL Hussaini, “Effect of Information Technology on Education,” International Journal of Information technology and Computer Engi-neering, no. 24, pp. 1–5, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.55529/ijitc24.1.5.

Y. Li, J. Dai, and L. Cui, “The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A mod-erated mediation model,” Int J Prod Econ, vol. 229, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107777.

C. Liu, J. T. Marchewka, J. Lu, and C. S. Yu, “Beyond concern-a privacy-trust-behavioral intention model of electronic commerce,” Information and Management, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 289–304, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2004.01.003.

S. Mardiana, “An Integrated Model of WebQual 4.0 and SERVQUAL: Answer to the Next Research Call,” JURNAL IPTEKKOM Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan & Teknologi Informasi, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 137–150, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.17933/iptekkom.25.1.2023.137-150.

K. Handayani, E. H. Juningsih, D. Riana, S. Hadianti, A. Rifai, and R. K. Serli, “Measuring the Quality of Website Services covid19.kalbarprov.go.id Using the Webqual 4.0 Method,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1641/1/012049.

M. L. Jundillah, J. E. Suseno, and B. Surarso, “Evaluation of E-learning Websites Using the Webqual Method and Importance Performance Analysis,” in E3S Web of Conferences, 2019. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/201912524001.

A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry, “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research,” J Mark, vol. 49, no. 4, p. 41, Autumn 1985, doi: 10.2307/1251430.

S. J. Barnes and R. Vidgen, “An Integrative Approach to the Assessment of E-Commerce Quality,” 2002. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220437591

M. J. Culnan and P. K. Armstrong, “Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation,” Organization Science, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 104–115, 1999, doi: 10.1287/orsc.10.1.104.

J. Vijaya Chandra, N. Challa, and S. K. Pasupuletti, “Authentication and authorization mechanism for cloud security,” Int J Eng Adv Technol, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 2072–2078, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijeat.F8473.088619.

F. Go and W. Zhang, “Applying importance-performance analysis to Beijing as an international meeting destination,” J Travel Res, vol. 35, no. 4, 1997, doi: 10.1177/004728759703500407.

B. L. Bruyere, D. A. Rodriguez, and J. J. Vaske, “Enhancing importance-performance analysis through segmentation,” Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, vol. 12, no. 1, 2002, doi: 10.1300/J073v12n01_05.

S. E. Sampson and M. J. Showalter, “The performance-importance response function: Observations and implications,” Service Industries Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, 1999, doi: 10.1080/02642069900000027.

I. Rašovská, M. Kubickova, and K. Ryglová, “Importance–performance analysis approach to destination management,” Tourism Economics, vol. 27, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1354816620903913.

M. A. Athallah and K. Kraugusteeliana, “Analisis Kualitas Website Telkomsel Menggunakan Metode Webqual 4.0 dan Importance Performance Analysis,” CogITo Smart Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.31154/cogito.v8i1.374.171-182.


Tips Main yang Aman dan Seru

judi bolavipbet88vipbet88bolago88clubjudi