ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF THE INFINITE LEARNING TRAINING COURSE WEBSITE AT INFINITE LEARNING USING THE WEBQUAL 4.0 METHOD AND IMPORTANCE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS (IPA)

Ginanjar Ilmi Nur Avicena
Muhammad Al Makky
Ikke Dian Oktaviani


DOI: https://doi.org/10.29100/jipi.v10i1.6067

Abstract


The training course sector in Indonesia has experienced rapid development in recent years. Many institutions offer various training courses to enhance skills and knowledge across different fields, from information technology to human resource management, with one such institution being Infinite Learning. The objective of this research is to assess the quality of the website and identify the factors that can improve its quality. Utilizing the Webqual 4.0 method as an evaluation indicator and Importance Performance Analysis to categorize the factors into quadrants based on the analysis of Importance Performance Analysis. Before data grouping, validity tests, reliability tests, and gap analysis between user expectations and perceptions need to be conducted. This step aims to strengthen the conclusions and recommendations produced after the research is completed. After conducting the research, the final results show that the Infinite Learning training course website has not met user expectations. This is evident from the gap analysis, which resulted in a score of -0.63, indicating that user expectations or importance are higher than the performance of the Infinite Learning training course website. The results of this research show that all performance values of each attribute are greater than the Importance values, indicating that users are satisfied with the services of the Infinite Learning training course website, with the highest value in the dimension of interaction quality at 0.93.

Keywords


Training Course; Webqual 4.0; Importance Performance Analysis; Infinite Learning;Website Evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics :

References


E.-S. T. Abumandour, “Public libraries’ role in supporting e-learning and spreading lifelong education: a case study,” J. Res. Innov. Teach. Learn., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 178–217, 2021, doi: 10.1108/jrit-06-2019-0063.

T. Muthuprasad, S. Aiswarya, K. S. Aditya, and G. K. Jha, “Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID -19 pandemic,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 100101, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101.

M. Labib Jundillah, J. Endro Suseno, and B. Surarso, “Evaluation of E-learning Websites Using the Webqual Method and Importance Performance Analysis,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 01, no. 201 9, pp. 1–5, 2010, [Online]. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/201.

J. F. Andry, K. Christianto, and F. R. Wilujeng, “Using Webqual 4.0 and Importance Performance Analysis to Evaluate E-Commerce Website,” J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Bus. Intell., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 23, 2019, doi: 10.20473/jisebi.5.1.23-31.

J. Jiang, “A systematic review for identifying instructional design strategies A systematic review for identifying instructional design strategies and principles in extended massive open online courses and principles in extended massive open online courses (xMOOCs),” West. Univ., vol. 81, no. 24, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etdhttps://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/8124

I. S. Utami, Winarno, and H. Setiadi, “Analysis the Effect of Website Quality on User Satisfaction with the WebQual 4.0 Method and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) (Case Study: SPMB Sebelas Maret University’s Website),” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1842, no. 1, pp. 0–8, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012003.

J. A. Martilla, And, and J. C. James, “Importance-Per Analysis,” J. Mark., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 77–79, 2010.

A. F. Tarasov, I. A. Getman, S. S. Turlakova, I. I. Stashkevych, and S. M. Kozmenko, “Methodical aspects of preparation of educational content on the basis of distance education platforms,” CEUR Workshop Proc., vol. 2643, pp. 161–173, 2020, doi: 10.55056/cte.326.

J. Li and Z. Ye, “Course Recommendations in Online Education Based on Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Algorithm,” Complexity, vol. 2020, 2020, doi: 10.1155/2020/6619249.

Y.-K. Huang, W.-S. Fan, M.-C. Tsai, and Y.-H. Ho, “Using Importance-Performance Analysis in Evaluating Taiwan Blog e-Service Quality,” J. Econ. Bus. Manag., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 338–345, 2015, doi: 10.7763/joebm.2015.v3.206.

P. G. M. de Jong, J. D. Pickering, R. A. Hendriks, B. J. Swinnerton, F. Goshtasbpour, and M. E. J. Reinders, “Twelve tips for integrating massive open online course content into classroom teaching,” Med. Teach., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 393–397, 2020, doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1571569.

G. Nalli, D. Amendola, A. Perali, and L. Mostarda, “Comparative analysis of clustering algorithms and moodle plugin for creation of student heterogeneous groups in online university courses,” Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 13, 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11135800.

W. N. W. Ab Rahman, H. Zulzalil, I. Ishak, and A. W. Selamat, “Analysis of web content quality factors for massive open online course using the rasch model,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 578–587, 2020, doi: 10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0110373.

I. S. Utami, Winarno, and H. Setiadi, “Analysis the Effect of Website Quality on User Satisfaction with the WebQual 4.0 Method and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) (Case Study: SPMB Sebelas Maret University’s Website),” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1842, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012003.

Sugiyono, “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Badan,” 2019.

G. D. G. E. Sidabutar, J. A. Seah, and Y. A. Singgalen, “Analysis and Design of Web-based Information System for Coffeeshop Management using Design Thinking Methodology: Case of Kopi KurangLebih,” J. Inf. Syst. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 217–231, 2023, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v5i1.455.