Philosophy Aspect in Business Basic I Book For ESP Student Used at University
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)Article Metrics :
References
Anderson, B. (2007). Pedagogical Rules and Their Relationship to Frequency in Input: Observational and Empirical Data from French, Applied Linguistics 28 (2)
Bazerman, C. (2002). Rhetorical research for reflective practice: A multi-layered narrative. In C. Candlin (Ed.), Research and practice in professional discourse (pp. 7993). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
Bhatia, V. K. (2002). Professional discourse: Towards a multi-dimensional approach and shared practice. In C. Candlin (Ed.), Research and practice in professional discourse (pp. 3960). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative Research of Education: An Introductive to Theories and Methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Diane D. Belcher. (2004). Trends In Teaching English for Specific Purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (2004) 24, 165B186. Printed in the USA. Cambridge University Press.
Gill, S. K. (2002a). International Communication: English Language Challenges for Malaysia. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Gill, S. K. (2002b). Language policy and English language standards in Malaysia: Nationalism versus pragmatism. Journal of Asia-Pacific Communication, 12(1), 95-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/japc. 12.1.07gil
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 1729.
Jantmary Thirusanku & Melor Md Yunus, (2014). Status of English in Malaysia. Asian Social Science; Vol. 10, No. 14; 2014. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education
Kress, G. (1998). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication: The potentials of new forms of text. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 5379). London: Routledge.
Merrifield, J. (1998). Contested ground: Performance accountability in adult basic education. NCSALL BriefsReport #1.
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2004).Curriculum foundation, principles and issues. Boston: Pearson.
Paltridge, B. (2002). Genre, text type, and the English for academic purposes (EAP) classroom. In A. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 7390). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sugiyono. (2013). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Swales, J. (2002). On models in applied discourse analysis. In C. Candlin (Ed.), Research and practice in professional discourse (pp. 6177). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
Swales, J., & Lindemann, S. (2002). Teaching the literature review to international graduate students. In A. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 105119). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Swales, J., & Luebs, M. (2002). Genre analysis and the advanced second language writer. In E. Barton & G. Stygall (Eds.), Discourse studies in composition (pp. 135154). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Watanabe, Norris, and Gonzalez-Lloret (2009). Identifying and responding to evaluation needs in College foreign language programs. In J. M. Norris, J. McE. Davis, C. Sinicrope, & Y. Watanabe (Eds.), Towards useful program evaluation in college foreign language education. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.