How Speech Acts Construct Polite Communication in Lecture Class Activities

Kokok Dj Purwanto, Arif Triyuono

Abstract


This study examines how politeness is constructed and maintained through verbal communication between lecturers and students during classroom activities. Drawing on pragmatic theory, specifically politeness and speech act theory, this study aims to understand how language functions socially in the context of classroom interactions. The analysis of classroom discourse identifies linguistic strategies that encourage mutual respect, cooperation and understanding. Data were obtained through classroom observations and recorded interactions, which were analyzed qualitatively to reveal patterns of polite language use. The results demonstrate that polite communication is manifested through indirect expressions, mitigation strategies, positive feedback and respectful forms of address. Lecturers predominantly use positive politeness strategies to manage authority while encouraging student participation. The study concludes that polite communication in classroom learning activities supports effective teaching and learning processes, strengthens interpersonal relationships, and creates an inclusive educational environment.


Keywords


Polite communication; speech acts; classroom activities; mitigation strategies; inclusive

Full Text:

PDF

References


Austin, J.L.(1984). How To Do Things with Words. Clarendon Press Oxford. New York: Oxford University Press.

Anshori, D.S.(2017). Analisis Wacana (Teori,Aplikasi, dan Pembelajaran). Bandung:

UPI Press.

Alwasilah, C. (2011). Pokoknya kualitatif: Dasar-dasar merancang dan melakukan penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Anugrah, A., Sudana, D., & Wirza, Y. (2020). Analisis Fonetik Segmentasi terhadap Inteligibilitas Pengucapan Bahasa Inggris Guru Bahasa Inggris Non-Penutur Asing. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 20 (3), 305-314.

Ashby, P., (2011). Understanding Phonetics. London: Hodder Education.

Ausuble, D. (1968). Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Avery, P., & Ehrlich, S. (1992). Teaching American English pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Azkarai, A., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2016). Negotiation of meaning strategies in child EFL mainstream and CLIL settings. TESOL Quarterly, 50 (4), 844–870.

Best, C. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In C. Goodman & H. Nusbaum (Eds), The development of speech perception, 167-224. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Weinreich, U. 1953. Languages in contact. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.

Yavaz, M. (2011). Applied English phonology. Wiley-Blackwell: A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication.

Yopp, H. K. (1992). Developing phonemic awareness in young children. Reading Teacher 45 (9): 696–703

Yule, George. (2006). The Study of Language. Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press.

Zsiga, E. C. (2020). The Phonology-Phonetic Interface. Edinburg Advanced Textbooks in Linguistics: Edinburg University Press Ltd.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29100/bright.v9i1.10101

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.29100/bright.v9i1.10101.g3409

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Kokok Dj Purwanto, Arif Triyuono

BRIGHT: A Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature
ISSN: 2599-0322 (Online)


Published by STKIP PGRI Tulungagung in collaboration with English Language Education Study Program Association (ELESPA)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.