ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT PADA PEMBELAJARAN CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING PENDEKATAN OPEN-ENDED

Desti Hana Windarti
Wardono Wardono
Scolastika Mariani


DOI: https://doi.org/10.29100/jp2m.v10i2.6419

Abstract


This research aims to determine the quality of creative mathematical thinking abilities in terms of AQ in CPS learning with an open-ended approach assisted by G. Classroom. The type of research is quantitative research. The research population was all class VII. The research sample used a cluster random sampling technique. The conclusions of the results of the analysis were: (1) the mathematical creative thinking ability of participants who received the CPS learning model with an open-ended approach assisted by Google Classroom achieved BTA (2) Students with the ability to think creatively mathematically in terms of AQ in CPS learning with an open-ended approach assisted with Google classroom achieves learning completeness of more than 75%, (3) the mathematical creative thinking ability in the CPS learning model with the open-ended approach assisted by G. Classroom is better than the PBL learning model, (4) the proportion of mathematical creative thinking ability completeness in the CPS learning model approach open-ended with the help of Google Classroom is more than the proportion of students in the PBL learning model, (5) there is a difference in the average increase in mathematical creative thinking abilities of students in the CPS learning model with the open-ended approach assisted with G. Classroom and students in the PBL learning model, (6) There is a positive influence on the adversity quotient on the ability to think creatively mathematically in mathematics learning


Keywords


berpikir kreatif; adversity quotient; creative problem solving; open-ended; g. classroom

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics :

References


Agus, Subaidi. (2016). Self-Efficacy Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Madura Pamekasa. http://dx.doi.org/10.53712/ sigma.v1i2.68

Atikasari, G., Agoestanto, A., & Winanti, K. (2018). Meningkatkan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis dan Kerjasama melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Strategi TTW Berbantuan Kartu Soal Materi Trigonometri SMAN 5 Semarang. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 601-607. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/

Budiyono. (2016). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Dahlan, T., Nurhadi, M., & Rohimah, S. M. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Open-Ended Terhadap Kemampuan berpikir Kreatif Matematis Mahasiswa PGSD. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 2, 53-66. https://doi/ org/ 10.23969/symmetry.v2il.381

Danielson, C. (2011). A Framework for Theaching. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 372-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694008.ch19

Dina, N. A., Amin, S. M., & Masriyah. (2018). Flexibility in Mathematics Problem Solving Based on Adversity Quotien N. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012025

Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., Saxena, A., & Basnet, R. B. (2017). Algorithmics Thinking, Cooperativity, Creativity, Critical Thingking, and Problem Solving: Exploring the Relationship between Computational Thingking Skills and Academic Performance. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(4), 355-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0090-9

Hidayat, W., & Sariningsih, R. (2018). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Adversity Quotient Siswa SMP Melalui Pembelajaran Open Ended. JNPM, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.101/S0962-8479(96)90008-8

Utami, R. W., Endaryono, B. T., & Djuhartono, T. (2020). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Open Ended. Faktor Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 43-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/fjik.v7i1.5328

Panuntun Hsm, S., Asikin, M., Waluya, B., & Zaenuri, Z. (2021). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Ditinjau dari Self Regulated Learning dengan Pendekatan Open-Ended Pada Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 13(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v13i1.847

Qin, L., Zhou, Y., & Tanu, W. T. (2019). The Analysis of Mathematics Adversity Quotient of Left Behind Junior High School Students in Rural Areas. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 331-342. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.710028

Sari, F. Y., Supriadi, N., & Putra, R. W. Y. (2022). Model Pembelajaran CUPs Berbantuan Media Handout: Dampak terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitir. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11, 95-106. https://doi.org/ 10.31980/mosharafa.v11i1.690

Sigit, D. V, Suryanda, A., Suprianti, E., & Ichsan, I. Z. (2019). The Effect of Adversity Quotient and Gender to Learning Outcome of High School Students. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(6), 34-37. https://www. scopus.com/ inward/record/uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85068565121&origin=inward

Sugilar, H. (2013). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Disposi Matematik Peserta Didik Madrasah Tsanawiyah Melalui Pembelajaran Generatif. Infinity Journal, 2(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v2i2.p156-168

Sugiyono. (2014). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukestiyarno. (2021a). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (3rd ed.). Alem Print.

Sukestiyarno. (2021b). Olah Data Deskriptif dan Inferensia (Teori dan Praktek).

Sunaringtyas, A. D., Asikin, M., & Junaedi, I. (2017). The Student’s Analysis of Creative Thingking Process in Solving Open Problems Viewed from Wallas Model on Problem Based Learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(3), 287-293. https://doi.org/10.15294/ ujme.v6i3.16084

Suyitno, A. (2020). Growth of Student Mathematical Creativity as Part of 4C Competence for Entering The 21 st Century. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, I4-9. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022100

Syahdan, St dan Annas, Suwardi. (2017). The Effectiveness Of The Implementation Of Experience, Language, Pictorial, Symbol, And Application (Elpsa) In Mathematics Learning Based On Bruners Theory To Class VII Students At Smpn 29 In Makassar. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika. https://doi.org/10.26858/jds.v4i2.2898

Treffinger, D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (2005). Creative Problem Solving: The History, Development, and Implications for Gifted Education and Talent Development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900407

Wanelly, W., & Fauzan, A. (2020). Pengaruh Pendekatan Open-Ended dan Gaya Belajar Siswa Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis. Journal Basicedu, 4(3), 523-533. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i3.388

Wang, H. C., Rose, C. P., & Chang, C. Y. (2011). Agent-Based Dynamic Support for Learning from Collaborative Brainstrorming in Scientific Inquiry. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2011 6:3, 6(3), 371-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11412-011-9124-X