Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

J-Adimas; Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat published scientific papers on Community Service (e-ISSN: 2613-9103). J-Adimas supports the analysis of activities related to the downstreaming of research results into anything that is directly useful to the community according to the rules of community service. J-Adimas limits community service that falls within the scope of: Human development in the field of education and socio-humanities, poverty alleviation, management of rural and coastal areas with local wisdom.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Caver dan Daftar Isi



Pelatihan Pengembangan Produk Bakery Berbasis Steaming Di Panti Asuhan Lksa Darul Hadlonah 2 Boyolali (35 - 39) Umar Hafidz Asy’ari Hasbullah


Pelatihan Teknisi Komputer (Hardware Dan Software) Untuk Mendukung Pendidikan Life Skills Bagi Santri Pondok Pesantren (40 - 43) Hendrik Kusbandono


Papan Akar Pangkat Dua (Papad) Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Pemahaman Bagi  Siswa Sdn Klepek Kecamatan Sukosewu Kabupaten Bojonegoro (44 - 49) Anis Umi Khoirotunnisa’


Media Pembelajaran Inovatif House Of Multiplication Bagi Siswa Sdn Sidorejo Sebagai Upaya Hitung Cepat Perkalian (50 - 56) Puput Suriyah


Packing Process Dalam Pelatihan Kemandirian Ukm Kerupuk Bawang Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Pemasaran Produk (57 - 62) Riski Nur Istiqomah Dinnullah


Pelatihan Dan Pembuatan Internet Of Things Untuk Lampu Hias Ruang Tamu Dengan Bahan Paralon Bekas Di Kelurahan Kedungbunder, Kecamatan Sutojayan Kabupaten Blitar, Propinsi Jawa Timur (63 - 69) Budi Artono


Pelatihan Praktek Model-Model Pembelajaran Pada Mahasiswa (70 - 73)Nur Farida

Pendampingan Penyusunan Laporan Keuangan Sesuai Standar Akuntansi Berbasis Etap Di Umkm Batik Tanjung Bumi Kabupaten Bangkalan (74 - 78) Aulia Dawam


Pelatihan Aplikasi Hot Potatoes Sebagai Bahan Ajar Berbasis Ict Guna Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru Sdit Telukjambe Timur Dan Sekolah Islam At-Taubah Karawang (79 - 83) Nina Puspitaloka


Langkah Awal Memulai Usaha Melalui Business Plan (84 – 88) Endah Andayani

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Caver dan Daftar Isi

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Every article that goes to the editorial staff will be selected through Initial Review processes by Editorial Board. Then, the articles will be sent to the Mitra Bestari/ peer reviewer and will go to the next selection by Double Blind Preview Process. After that, the articles will be returned to the authors to revise. These processes take a month for a maximum time. In the each manuscript, Mitra Bebestari/ peer reviewer will be rated from the substantial and technical aspects. Mitra Bebestari/ peer reviewer that collaboration with Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini is the experts in the Early Childhood Education area and issues around it. They were experienced in the prestigious journal management and publication that was spread around the national and abroad. All submitted manuscripts are read by editorial staff. Those Manuscript evaluated by editors to be inappropiate to journal criteria are rejected promptly without external review. Manuscript evaluated to be of potential interest to our readership are sent to double bilnd reviewers. The editors then make a decision based on the reviewer's recommendation from among several possibilities : rejected, revision required, or accepted. The editor has the right to decide which manuscripts submitted to the journal should be published. Review Process :

  1. Author submit the manuscript
  2. Editor Evaluation (some manuscript are rejected or returned before the review process)
  3. Double Bind peer review process
  4. Editor Decision
  5. Confirmation to the author


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Publication Ethics

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JIPI Journals is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher, and the society.  

Universitas Bhinneka PGRI as the publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions
The editors of the JIPI journals are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Section A: Publication and authorship 

  1. All submitted papers are subject to a strict peer-review process by at least two international reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
  2. Review process are blind peer review.
  3. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability, and language.
  4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
  5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
  7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.
  8. No research can be included in more than one publication. 

Section B: Authors’ responsibilities

  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 
  4. Authors must participate in the peer review process. 
  5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
  6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
  7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
  8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
  9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
  10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors. 

Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities

  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information. 
  2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
  3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
  4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
  5. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. 

Section D: Editors’ responsibilities

  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
  6. Editors should have a clear picture of a research’s funding sources.
  7. Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication’s scope.
  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason. 
  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers. 
  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
  13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.


Journal History

No Journal History this moment


Author Fees

If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be required to pay a Publication Fee of IDR 100,000 for the article to cover publication costs.



Basiron, S.Pd., M.Pd.
Editor in Chief
Universitas Bhinneka PGRI
Jalan Major Sujadi Timur 7,
Plosokandang, Kedungwaru Tulungagung,
Kabupaten Tulungagung, Jawa Timur 66229,
Phone: +6281217123001