EVALUATING SCIENCE LEARNING ASSESSMENTS: ALIGNING 21ST-CENTURY SKILLS AND LOCAL WISDOM FOR FUTURE TEACHERS IN 5.0
Abstract
Recently, Indonesian higher education has redesigned curricula under the Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) policy to enhance student proficiency. This comprehensive framework covers learning outcomes, materials, processes, and assessment, with effective evaluation crucial for gauging learning outcomes and engaging students. This study explores the need for assessments based on local wisdom in science education to measure 21st-century skills for prospective teachers in Society 5.0. Using qualitative exploratory methods, the research involved interviews and document analysis with faculty from Universitas Islam Lamongan's Science Education Program. The findings reveal that while current assessments use diverse methods and address some 21st-century skills, they require better integration of local wisdom and consistent standards. Challenges include insufficient understanding of local wisdom integration, varied student competencies, and a lack of practical, context-driven strategies. The study recommends developing holistic assessments that incorporate local wisdom, practical experiences, and technology.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFArticle Metrics :
References
(OECD), O. f.-o. (2018). Equity in education: Breaking down barriers to social mobility. OECD Publishing.
Andrade, L. H. (2005). Teaching with rubrics: The good, the bad, and the ugly. College Teaching, 27-31.
Arifin, M., Susilo, H., & Rohman, F. (2020). The integration of local wisdom into the science curriculum: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 527-537.
Arsanti, M., Zulaeha, I., Subiyantoro, S., & S, N. H. (2021). Tuntutan Kompetensi 4C Abad 21 dalam Pendidikan di Peguruan Tinggi untuk Menghadapi Era Society 5.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang (pp. 319-324). Semarang: PPS UNNES.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). UK: Open University Press.
Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 5-31.
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. Virginia USA: ASCD.
Chappuis, J., & Stiggins, R. J. (2017). An Introduction to Student Involved Assessment FOR Learning Seventh Edition. Pearson.
Cheng, G., & Lai, C. (2019). Facilitating learning from feedback with technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 341-354.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). California: Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2019). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 97-140.
Dewanti, B. A., & Santoso, A. (2020). Development of 21st Century Learning Skills Assessment Instruments in STEM-Based Science Learning (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 99-111.
Dewi, N. E., Kusumawati, M., & Artini, L. P. (2019). Community-based projects as a tool to develop students’ social responsibility. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 40-55.
Fink, L. D. (2019). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. Josey-Bass.
Guskey, T. R., & Brookhart, S. M. (2019). What we know about grading: What works, what doesn't, and what's next. UK: ASCD.
Hasibuan, A. T., & Prastowo, A. (2019). Konsep Pendidikan Abad 21: Kepemimpinan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia SD/MI. Magistra, 25-50.
Hattie, J., & Yates, G. C. (2014). Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn. London: Routledge.
Hendarman. (2019). CHALLENGES FOR 21st CENTURY LEARNING IN INDONESIA. The Fourth International Conference on Education and Language (4th ICEL) 2016 (pp. 19-25). Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia: Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL).
Heny Sulistyaningrum, A. W. (2019). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN AWAL 21stCENTURY SKILLSMAHASISWA CALON GURU SD. JPDN, 142-158.
Jarwo, Sumarno, & Siswanto, J. (2022). Pengembangan E-Instrumen Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Berbasis Kearifan Lokal untuk Siswa Kelas VI SD. Jurnal Kualita Pendidikan, 67-71.
Kemendikbud. (2020a). Buku Saku Panduan Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.
Kemendikbud. (2020b). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi di Era Industri 4.0 untuk Mendukung Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.
Knight, P. T., Tait, J., & Yorke, M. (2006). The professional learning of teachers in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 319-339.
McMillan, J. H. (2011). Classroom Assessment : Principles and Practice for Effective Standards-Based Instruction. Boston: Pearson.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teachers’ knowledge. Teachers College Record, 1017-1054.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 199-218.
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 129-144.
Rahman, F., Ahmad, M., & Saleh, A. (2021). Integrating local wisdom in science education: Challenges and strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1225-1240.
Redecker, C., & Johannessen, O. (2013). Changing assessment—Towards a new assessment paradigm using ICT. European Journal of Education, 79-96.
Sari, S. P., Siregar, E. F., & Lubis, B. S. (2021). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Blended Learning Berbasis Model Flipped Learning untuk Meningkatkan 6C For HOTS Mahasiswa PGSD UMSU. Jurnal BASICEDU, 3460-3471.
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60.
Schwab, K. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. Geneva Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
Septikasari, R., & Frasandy, R. N. (2018). KETERAMPILAN 4C ABAD 21 DALAM PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN DASAR. Tarbiyah Al-Awlad : Jurnal Kependidikan Islam Tingkat Dasar, 107-117.
Siagian, P., Hasibuan, Z., & Nugroho, L. E. (2021). Digital storytelling in education: Enhancing students' understanding of local wisdom. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 115-134.
Suastra, I. W. (2010). Model Pembelajaran Sains Berbasis Budaya Lokal untuk Mengembangkan Kompetensi Dasar Sains dan Nilai Kearifan Lokal di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 8-16.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Tanujaya, B., Mumu, J., & Margono, G. (2017). project-based learning fosters critical thinking and problem-solving skills by engaging students in meaningful projects that connect classroom learning with real-world applications. International Education Studies, 78-85.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Josey-Bass.
Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2019). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 634-647.
Widyaningrum, R. (2018). Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Etnosains untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran IPA dan Menanamkan Nilai Kearifan Lokal di Sekolah Dasar. Widya Wacana, 26-32.
Wiggins, G. (1990, Dec). The Case for Authentic Assessment. ERIC Digest. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED328611