AUGMENTED REALITY DALAM PEMBELAJARAN KIMIA: KAJIAN SISTEMATIS TENTANG DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP MOTIVASI DAN SIKAP BELAJAR SISWA (TAHUN 2020–2025)

Sekar Syawalahayati, Munir Munir, Septi Yunita, Silmi Indah Fakhira

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji pengaruh Augmented Reality (AR) terhadap motivasi, minat, dan sikap belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran kimia melalui pendekatan Systematic Literature Review. Pencarian dilakukan pada database Scopus, Taylor & Francis, dan ACS Publications dengan batas waktu 2020–2025. Proses seleksi menghasilkan delapan artikel yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi, seluruhnya merupakan penelitian empiris pada jenjang sekolah dan mengukur aspek afektif pembelajaran. Analisis menunjukkan bahwa AR secara konsisten meningkatkan attention, relevance, confidence, dan satisfaction melalui visualisasi tiga dimensi, interaksi manipulatif, serta pengalaman belajar yang imersif. Selain itu, efektivitas AR terbukti sangat dipengaruhi oleh strategi implementasi yang digunakan. Empat strategi utama yang teridentifikasi adalah AR manipulatif 3D, AR berbasis permainan, AR kontekstual–multimodal, dan AR eksploratif, masing-masing berkontribusi pada peningkatan keterlibatan afektif melalui mekanisme yang berbeda. Hasil kajian menegaskan bahwa keberhasilan AR tidak hanya bergantung pada teknologinya, tetapi pada desain pedagogis yang menyertainya. Temuan ini memberikan dasar empiris bagi guru dan pengembang kurikulum untuk memanfaatkan AR sebagai media pembelajaran kimia yang mampu memperkuat motivasi dan sikap positif siswa.

Keywords


Augmented Reality; Pembelajaran Kimia; Motivasi Belajar; Sikap Belajar; Keterlibatan Siswa; SLR

References


Abualrob, M., & Awad, T. (2023). Developing an augmented reality-based board game for teaching atomic models. Science Education International, 35(3), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v35.i3.3

Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and Challenges Associated with Augmented Reality for Education: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002

Badilla-Quintana, M. G., Sepulveda-Valenzuela, E., & Salazar Arias, M. (2020). Augmented Reality as a Sustainable Technology to Improve Academic Achievement in Students with and without Special Educational Needs. Sustainability, 12(19), 8116. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198116

Bandura A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032

Câmara Olim, S., Nisi, V., & Romão, T. (2024). Periodic fable discovery: An augmented reality serious game to introduce and motivate young children towards chemistry. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83, 52593–52619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17526-9

Chen, S.-Y., & Liu, S.-Y. (2020). Using augmented reality to experiment with elements in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106418

Coştu, F. (2025). Exploring augmented reality (AR) in science education: Perspectives from gifted students. The Journal of Educational Research, 118(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2024.2431681

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Elford, D., Lancaster, S. J., & Jones, G. A. (2022). Fostering motivation toward chemistry through augmented reality educational escape activities: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(10), 3406–3417. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00428

Fiadillah, M. F., Sumarni, W., Sumarti, S. S., Rahayu, E. F., Kadarwati, S., Harjono, & Ramadhani, D. G. (2025). Where students struggle: Using data to uncover bottleneck in chemistry literacy. Science Talks, 16, 100484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sctalk.2025.100484

Flaherty, A. A. (2020). A review of affective chemistry education research and its implications for future research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21, 698–713. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00200F

Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., Ghamrawi, N. A., Abu-Tineh, A., Alshaboul, Y., & Alazaizeh, M. A. (2025). A step-by-step approach to systematic reviews in educational research. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 549-566. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.14.2.549

Handayani, D., Anwar, Y. A. S., Junaidi, E., & Hadisaputra, S. (2022). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Kimia Materi Asam Basa Berbasis Problem Based Learning (PBL) untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Chemistry Education Practice, 5(1), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v5i1.2765

Harahap, L. K., & Siregar, A. D. (2020). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Adobe Flash Cs6 Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 10(1), 1910–1924. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v10n1.p1910-1924

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

Johnstone, A. (1982). Macro- and Micro-Chemistry. School Science Review, 64, 377-379.

Lin, L., & Atkinson, R.K. (2011). Using animations and visual cueing to support learning of scientific concepts and processes. Computers and Education, 56(3), 650-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.007

Liu, Q., Ma, J., Yu, S., & Zhang, P. (2023). Effects of an augmented reality-based chemistry experiential application on student knowledge gains, learning motivation, and technology perception. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10014-z

Lu, A., Ciampa, K., Ma, L., & Fung, H. N. (2021). Supporting flipped and gamified learning with an augmented reality smartphone app in tertiary chemistry. Frontiers in Education, 6, 623745. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.623745

Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Moju, M., Taylor, L., & Iweuno, B. (2025). Tackling the challenge of chemical representations through sensemaking practices in chemistry education. Discover Education, 4, 352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00703-3

Muderawan, I. W., Wiratma, I. G. L., & Nabila, M. Z. (2019). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar Siswa pada Pelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 3(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v3i1.20944

Priliyanti, A., Muderawan, I. W., & Maryam, S. (2021). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa dalam mempelajari kimia kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Undiksha, 5(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpimi.v2i1.2246

Sibomana, A., Karegeya, C., & Sentongo, J. (2021). Factors Affecting Secondary School Students’ Academic Achievements in Chemistry. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.12.7

Simatupang, A. (2021). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Kimia Di SMA Negeri 2 Kota Jambi. SECONDARY: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Menengah , 1(3), 199-205. https://doi.org/10.51878/secondary.v1i3.346

Supadmi, N. L., Wiratma, I. G. L., & Merta, L. M. (2017). Penerapan Metode Mind Mapping untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa Kelas X MIA. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 1(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v1i2.12811

Syskowski, S., Lathwesen, C., Maurer, N., Siol, A., Eilks, I., & Huwer, J. (2024). Interactive Learning with iPads and Augmented Reality: A Sustainability-Oriented Approach to Teaching Plastics Chemistry. Sustainability, 16(8), 3342. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083342

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education (pp. 37–76). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8

Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, Submicro, and Symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet.” International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903386435

Uriarte-Portillo, A., Ibáñez, M. B., Zatarain-Cabada, R., & Barrón-Estrada, M. L. (2023). Comparison of using an augmented reality learning tool at home and in a classroom regarding motivation and learning outcomes. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 7(3), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7030023

Wildan, W., Supriadi, S., Hadisaputra, S., Muti’ah, M., Siahaan, J., & Ariani, S. (2023). Melatih model mental kimia siswa SMAN 1 Sambelia menggunakan media augmented reality. Jurnal Pengabdian Inovasi Masyarakat Indonesia, 2(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpimi.v2i1.2246

Wu, M. M., & Yezierski, E. J. (2022). Pedagogical chemistry sensemaking: A novel conceptual framework to facilitate pedagogical sensemaking in model-based lesson planning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23 (2), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RP00282A

Yoon, S., Anderson, E., Lin, J., & Elinich, K. (2017). How augmented reality enables conceptual understanding of challenging science content. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 156–168. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.20.1.156




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29100/eduproxima.v8i3.9678

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.