An Analysis of Online Corrective Feedback Implementation in Writing Class

Titik Lina Widyaningsih


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29100/bright.v2i1.740

Sari


In an academic setting, writing is a skill which requires a high level of cognitive competencies. It means that as the students of university should prepare themselves for always being active learners to improve their level of cognitive competencies used for their writing skills. Nowadays, the range of technologies are available to be used in the class. To make the atmosphere in the class be more challenging and interesting, there are many lecturers use technology in their writing class. As one of example, utilizing technology in writing class, especially in providing the feedback for the students to enhance students’ written performance. This research focused on analyzing the implementation of online corrective feedback (via e-mail) in the writing class. This research was conducted in the second semester students of English Department. The researcher used qualitative method to conduct this research. There were three kinds of instruments used in this research. There were interview, observation, and questionnaire. The result of this research showed that the implementation of online corrective feedback was really effective for the students’ writing skills improvement. The lecturer’s activities, the students’ responses, and the online corrective feedback implementation itself were the factors that could not be separated in gaining a successful teaching and learning process in writing class.

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Beauvois, M. H. (1998). Conversations in Slow Motion: Computer-Mediated Communication in the Foreign Language Classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(2), 198–217. http://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.54.2.198

Godwin-jones, R. (2008). Web-Writing 2 . 0 : Enabling , Documenting , and Assessing Writing Online. Assessing Writing, 12(2), 7–12. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num2/emerging.pdf

Guasch, T., Espasa, A., Alvarez, I. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Effects of feedback on collaborative writing in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 34(3), 324–338. http://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835772

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Feedback in second language writing: …. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(02), 83. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399

Lee, I. (1997). ESL learners’ performance in error correction in writing: Some implications for teaching. System, 25(4), 465–477. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00045-6

Lee, I. (2005). Error correction in the L2 writing classroom: What do students think? TESL Canada Journal, 22(2), 1–16.

Li, Y. (2000). Linguistic characteristics of ESL writing in task-based e-mail activities. System, 28(2), 229–245. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00009-9

Liaw, M.-L. (1998). Using electronic mail for English as a Foreign Language instruction. System, 26(3), 335–351. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00025-6

Murray, R., Thow, M., Moore, S., & Murphy, M. (2008). The writing consultation: developing academic writing practices. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32(2), 119–128. http://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701851854

Nobles, S., & Paganucci, L. (2015). Do Digital Writing Tools Deliver? Student Perceptions of Writing Quality Using Digital Tools and Online Writing Environments. Computers and Composition, 38, 16–31. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.001

Norcini, J. (2010). The power of feedback. Medical Education. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03542.x

Paltridge, B. (2014). Academic writing. Language Teaching, (September), 87–105. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444804002216

Papanis, E., Giavrimis, P., & Papani, E. M. (2010). The contribution of the internet into learning. Review of European Studies, 2(1), 54–60. http://doi.org/10.5539/res.v2n1p54

Rao, Z. (2007). Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. ELT Journal, 61(2), 100–106. http://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm002

Stepp-greany, J. (2002). Student Perceptions on Language Learning in a Technological Environment: Implications for the New Millenium. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 165–180. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/steppgreany/

Tafazoli, D., Nosratzadeh, H., & Hosseini, N. (2014). Computer-mediated Corrective Feedback in ESP Courses: Reducing Grammatical Errors via Email. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 355–359. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.341

Tuzi, F. (2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition, 21(2), 217–235. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003

Yeh, S. W., & Lo, J. J. (2009). Using online annotations to support error correction and corrective feedback. Computers and Education, 52(4), 882–892. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.014

Yunus, M. M., & Chien, C. H. (2016). The Use of Mind Mapping Strategy in Malaysian University English Test (MUET) Writing. Creative Education, 07(04), 619–626. http://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.74064


Article Metrics

Sari view : 29 times
PDF View : 17 times

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.