Analysis of Cohesion and Coherence in the Background of Thesis Written by English Education Study Program Students of IAIN Bengkulu in Period September 2020

Pebri Prandika Putra
Yuni Astari


DOI: https://doi.org/10.29100/bright.v5i1.2447

Abstract


This study aimed to find kinds of cohesion and coherence in the background section of thesis, it also focused to analyze the use of cohesion and coherence in the background section of thesis by English Education Study Program students of IAIN Bengkulu in period September 2020. This study concerned with text analysis. the method in this study was descriptive qualitative. The writer used documentation in collecting data. The data of this study were ten background of thesis which were taken randomly from the background section of thesis by English Education Study Program students of IAIN Bengkulu in period September 2020. The findings of the study showed cohesion and coherence in the background of thesis achieve by the used cohesive and coherent devices. There are two types of cohesion, namely grammatical cohesion and lexical cohesion. From the findings, the students can build grammatical cohesion which consist of reference as much as 53%, substitution 6%, and conjunction 35%. Unfortunately, ellipsis is not found in the background of thesis. While lexical cohesion which consist of reiteration as much as 4% and 2%. In addition, students build coherence as much as 57% at consistent pronoun, 38% at transition signals, 3% at repeating key nouns, and 2% at logical order. In conclusion, the writer concluded that the background section of thesis by English Education Study Program students of IAIN Bengkulu in period September 2020 are organized as well and become good background of thesis because used cohesion and coherence devices in creating the sentences and paragraphs variously.


Keywords


Cohesion, Coherence, Background of Thesis

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics :

References


Alidoost, Yadollah, Soudabeh Tabatabaei, and Morteza Bakhtiarvand. 2014. The Effect of Picture Story in Creating Textual Coherence in Narrative Genre. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4(2):35965.

Bhatia. V. K. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.

Dirven & Marjolijn. 2004. Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics (Cognitive Linguistics in Practice). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Emilia, Emi, Nurfitri Habibi, and Lungguh Ariang Bangga. 2018. An Anlysis of Cohesion of Exposition Texts: An Indonesian Context. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics 7(3):51523.

Halliday MAK. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Sydney: Edward Arnold, Ltd.

Halliday MAK and Ruqaiya. H. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman Group Ltd.

Karjono, J. C. Setyo. 2020. Coherence in Thesis Proposal Writings of Undergraduate Students. Jellt 4(1):1730.

Katamba, Francis. 2020. Should English Be Spelt as She Is Spoke?

Latifah, Ani, and Sulis Triyono. 2020. Cohesion and Coherence of Discourse in the Story of Layangan Putus on Social Media Facebook. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics 5(1):41.

Mcmillan.J.H. 2008. Educational Research: Fundamental for Consumer, Fifth Edition. Boston: Pearson International Edition.

Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2000. HANDBOOK-OF-QUALITATIVE-RESEARCH.Pdf. California: Sage Publication.

Nunan, D. 1992. Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Paltridge and Starfield. 2007. Thesis and Dissertation Writing in a Second Language. New York: Roudledge.

Wang, Yuan, and Minghe Guo. 2014. A Short Analysis of Discourse Coherence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5(2):46065.

Zemach D. E & Lisa. 2005. Academic Writing: From Paragraph to Essay. Oxford: Macmillan Publisher Limited.